For llama.cpp, it helps to think in terms of inputs, constraints, verification, and iteration.
One important area is privacy considerations. Define what a good result looks like before changing tools or settings, then test one variable at a time so you can tell what actually improved the outcome.
Another area is deployment. Keep examples of both strong and weak outputs, check important facts or generated code independently, and document settings that produce consistent results.
The main takeaway is that llama.cpp becomes much more reliable when the workflow includes clear inputs, repeatable checks, and a way to learn from previous results.
One important area is privacy considerations. Define what a good result looks like before changing tools or settings, then test one variable at a time so you can tell what actually improved the outcome.
Another area is deployment. Keep examples of both strong and weak outputs, check important facts or generated code independently, and document settings that produce consistent results.
The main takeaway is that llama.cpp becomes much more reliable when the workflow includes clear inputs, repeatable checks, and a way to learn from previous results.