I wanted to start a broader ideas worth trying thread around llama.cpp.
A useful angle is quality versus speed, but it also connects with getting started. Different tools and workflows can produce very different results even when the goal is similar.
It would be interesting to compare practical examples, experiments, setups, or lessons that show where llama.cpp is genuinely useful and where it still needs improvement.
A useful angle is quality versus speed, but it also connects with getting started. Different tools and workflows can produce very different results even when the goal is similar.
It would be interesting to compare practical examples, experiments, setups, or lessons that show where llama.cpp is genuinely useful and where it still needs improvement.