Recent content by ethantherobot

I wanted to start a broader mistakes and lessons thread around LM Studio. A useful angle is quality versus speed, but it also connects with productivity. Different tools and workflows can produce very different results even when the goal is similar. It would be interesting to compare practical...

I think step and cost is the key part of this topic. A practical approach is to define the outcome you want, test it with a small example, and then check quality, speed and reliability separately. That way you can improve the workflow without losing track of what caused the improvement.

For ROS & ROS2, it helps to think in terms of inputs, constraints, verification, and iteration. One important area is advanced workflows. Define what a good result looks like before changing tools or settings, then test one variable at a time so you can tell what actually improved the outcome...