Recent content by connor3104

A useful way to understand Rust is to separate the goal, the input, the model or tool, and the way the output is evaluated. One important area is automation. Define what a good result looks like before changing tools or settings, then test one variable at a time so you can tell what actually...

The point about no-code and automation is interesting. In practice I would keep the first test simple, record what worked, and only add extra complexity if it solves a specific limitation. It also gives you a cleaner baseline if you want to compare tools or settings later.

For Claude, it helps to think in terms of inputs, constraints, verification, and iteration. One important area is quality versus speed. Define what a good result looks like before changing tools or settings, then test one variable at a time so you can tell what actually improved the outcome...